ChinaRecap.
Independent archive
English
中文Español日本語Français
← People & placesInstitution

Supreme People's Court 最高人民法院

Names and data status

Shared activities do not establish personal relationships or affiliations.

Compare this entity →
2026-10-15 — 2026-11-13 · Change filters
Advanced filters
Reset all filters
30/30 days processed · Missing coverage is unknown.
Data & counting

Source archive 2026-10-13 — 2026-11-13

Activities count extracted event records with explicit participation or location links; repeated reports may describe the same real-world activity. Related reports count entity mentions, while keyword search counts text matches. Status labels describe the source report, not a live activity status. Unknown event dates are never replaced by broadcast dates. Counts describe this archive, not public popularity.

Report history 7

Archive total 7

Distinct reports by broadcast date. * Partial coverage; — unknown.

View counts and coverage

Activity filters do not affect these counts. Background mentions are included, and each source story counts once.

Latest activities

On October 23, the Supreme People's Court released representative cases involving people's assessors participating in trials.

View evidence

On October 23, the Supreme People's Court released representative cases involving people's assessors participating in trials.

Translated paragraph context
The Supreme People's Court released representative cases involving people's assessors' participation in trials on October 23. As of the end of 2025, there were 340,000 people's assessors nationwide. People's courts are continuing to improve mechanisms for their participation in trials, specifying that each people's assessor should generally participate in no more than 30 cases annually and encouraging greater participation in cases involving group interests, the public interest, and substantial social impact.
Original Chinese quote
最高人民法院今天(10月23日)发布人民陪审员参审典型案例。
Read matching source paragraph →

It was proposed that the session deliberate on the Supreme People's Court's report on people's assessors and the Supreme People's Procuratorate's report on intellectual property procuratorial work.

View evidence

It was proposed that the session deliberate on the Supreme People's Court's report on people's assessors and the Supreme People's Procuratorate's report on intellectual property procuratorial work.

Translated paragraph context
The agenda proposed by the Council of Chairpersons for the Standing Committee's 25th session also includes: deliberating on the State Council's report on financial work, its comprehensive report on the management of state-owned assets in 2025, and its special report on the management of state-owned natural resource assets in 2025; deliberating on the Supreme People's Court's report on the work of people's assessors in the people's courts; deliberating on the Supreme People's Procuratorate's report on intellectual property procuratorial work by the people's procuratorates; deliberating on reports by the NPC Standing Committee's law enforcement inspection teams on inspections of the implementation of the Food Security Law, the Hainan Free Trade Port Law, and the Law on Building a Barrier-Free Environment; deliberating on reports submitted respectively by the NPC Supervision and Judicial Affairs Committee, Financial and Economic Affairs Committee, Environment Protection and Resources Conservation Committee, Agriculture and Rural Affairs Committee, and Social Development Affairs Committee on the results of their deliberations on deputies' motions referred to them by the presidium of the fourth session of the 14th NPC; deliberating on the report by the NPC Standing Committee's Credentials Committee on the qualifications of individual deputies; and deliberating on relevant appointments and removals, among other matters.
Original Chinese quote
审议最高人民法院关于人民法院人民陪审员工作情况的报告;审议最高人民检察院关于人民检察院知识产权检察工作情况的报告
Read matching source paragraph →

On October 21, the Supreme People's Court issued regulations on judicial accountability in people's courts. The report states that judicial personnel should be held accountable for deliberately violating adjudicative duties or committing gross negligence in those duties that causes serious consequences, with accountability covering all judicial personnel and the entire adjudication process.

View evidence

On October 21, the Supreme People's Court issued regulations on judicial accountability in people's courts. The report states that judicial personnel should be held accountable for deliberately violating adjudicative duties or committing gross negligence in those duties that causes serious consequences, with accountability covering all judicial personnel and the entire adjudication process.

Translated paragraph context
Today, October 21, the Supreme People's Court released the Regulations on Judicial Accountability in People's Courts. Judicial personnel in people's courts who intentionally violate their adjudicative duties, or whose gross negligence in performing those duties causes serious consequences, shall be held judicially accountable. Accountability will cover all judicial personnel and every stage of the judicial adjudication process.
Original Chinese quote
最高人民法院今天(10月21日)发布《人民法院司法责任追究条例》。人民法院司法人员故意违反审判职责,或者履行审判职责存在重大过失造成严重后果的,应当追究司法责任,责任追究实现司法人员和司法审判流程全覆盖。
Read matching source paragraph →
Source evidence